Depression meds: what happened to sadness?

I read this CNN article about depression meds (”CDC: Antidepressants most prescribed drugs in U.S.”) and felt a rant coming on. The story’s example is a woman who does not wish to confront her husband about his irresponsible financial practices, so her doc prescribes antidepressants. She feels better thereafter. I don’t have a comprehensive CPT code book or a DSM-IV manual here in my office, but I think I’m on solid ground assuming that “lack of backbone” is not a psychiatric or medical diagnosis that necessitates treatment with psychotropic medication.

CNN picked an absurd example to prove its point, but other examples abound in the world around us that are really very similar, and I think we as a society have become inured to this phenomenon. It is extremely common to hear people who have lost a spouse, gone through a divorce, or received a terminal disease diagnosis to report taking antidepressant medications as a result. These folks aren’t depressed. They’re SAD. They’re experiencing a reasonable and expected human response to a disturbing event or series of events—NOT a disease process. And, as with the woman exemplified in the CNN article, by taking these drugs instead of dealing with the problem at hand, they are just putting off eventually having to do it. Isn’t this a bad idea? It seems like chemical rationalization to me, by which I mean the following: it is no different from making up REALLY GOOD reasons why I don’t really need to write my stress management paper yet (I can deal with it later, after all…).

These medications are not, but should be, restricted to individuals with the actual psychiatric disorder of major depression. “Depression” has come to mean “sadness” in our society, and this is a bad idea. It pathologizes an entire range of normal human emotion and makes those who choose to admit and process their sadness seem abnormal or even “in denial” and “in need of treatment.” Sadness is not depression. If someone has lost a spouse, has had to put her cat to sleep, or any number of similar saddening events, she probably DOES weep and have difficulty getting out of bed or concentrating: looks like depression, but is not depression. “Depression” is not being able to get out of bed and staring at the ceiling all day thinking of ways to kill yourself and, more importantly, trying to figure out how to get the energy to do so. It is not in response to an EVENT.

Zombifying our population is not an answer. Physicians seem to have no problem handing out these meds like candy to anyone who asks, and patients are asking. Oh boy are they asking. No one WANTS to feel bad. But what ever happened to giving other things a try first? Some folks need these meds: no doubt about it. But most don’t, and no one can tell the difference if our entire populace starts popping pills at the first sign of an emotional twinge.

6 Responses to “Depression meds: what happened to sadness?”


  1. 1 Counting Sheep July 10, 2007 at 4:39 pm

    Couldn’t agree with you more!!!!

    Well said.

  2. 2 Hula July 11, 2007 at 9:34 am

    Ah, but what is the cause? What makes people in one of the most prosperous nations so unhappy?

    Advertising and our culture of instant gratification surely contribute to people lining up for meds. But it’s not just the availability and acceptability of pharmaceuticals at work.

    Perhaps there is some cognitive dissonance going on that makes people more willing to attribute their feelings to depression. Most people want to the least amount of work to get maximum results. That’s human nature. Maybe we feel guilty for having it so easy and still being dissatisfied. Technology is supposed to make our lives less complicated when often it has the exact opposite effect. What does that say about our future?

    (Full disclosure: I’ve been on meds for depression for about a year and now I can go to work and I don’t feel like stepping out in front of a bus most days. Praise Wellbutrin!)

  3. 3 notratched July 11, 2007 at 9:59 am

    Certainly there is a lot to this issue. Our society is plagued with apathy and dissatisfaction in the midst of plenty (for many of us, anyway). I just wish a sharper line were drawn between normal human responses (emotionally desirable or not) and psychiatric conditions that exist independently of situational factors. I take meds myself (for anxiety)—but I exhausted all other avenues for coping with it. I know people do that with depression and other things too. It just bugs me when the FIRST thing tried is pill popping!

  4. 4 Hula July 11, 2007 at 2:07 pm

    Listening to Morphine’s “Cure for Pain”…

    “someday there’ll be a cure for pain, that’s the day I throw my drugs away”

  5. 5 markps2 July 16, 2007 at 4:04 am

    What about some proof of a brain chemical imbalance , that the drugs fix, how about that?
    As an “actual psychiatric disorder” patient I don’t want to bogart http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bogart
    the drugs . You’re free to have them if you want them.
    Ever heard of personal responsibility? or does that come in pill form now?

  6. 6 notratched July 16, 2007 at 5:54 am

    markps2: I don’t want to ignore your comment, but I’m not quite sure what you mean about personal responsibility and its relationship to my post. I apologize if the post has angered you. If you’d like to explain what you mean by your comment or why you are angry, perhaps we can talk more about it. Otherwise, I guess I can just say yes, I have heard of personal responsibility. :)

Leave a Reply




Hedwig with freaky eyes

Archives